Material and methods

To investigate stereotypes off subgroups of women and you can boys, i very first held an excellent airplane pilot data so you’re able to harvest a listing of modern-day gender subgroups during the Norwegian community.

Pilot Analysis

Users (Letter = 60) have been approached in public places in the city cardiovascular system regarding Bergen, Norway, and you can expected to engage in a primary questionnaire from the which organizations they sense that women and you can males inside the area is actually divided in to. Among the many users, 50.0% was indeed girls. A forty eight.3% was basically boys (you to definitely new member didn’t answer comprehensively the question on the intercourse/gender dos ) and imply many years are (SD = , variety 18–79). Most (90.0%) didn’t have an enthusiastic immigrant record. The rest had sometimes immigrated themselves (6.7%) or was Norwegian born to a single otherwise two immigrant parents (1.7%). One to participant did not answer the background matter.

The newest instruction on the members is actually as the: ‘There are many different “types” of women in the current people. Delight write-down as many different kinds of female (e.g., parents out of young children, businesswomen) as you can consider.’ her The remainder page are kept blank toward participant to type towards the. With the a separate page, an identical education writing on particular guys is shown. The transaction out-of speech is actually counterbalanced in order for half of the players noted females very first, another 1 / 2 of listed people basic.

Typically, the players noted 7.twenty-eight different kinds of females (SD = cuatro.07, variety 0–21) and seven.42 different kinds of people (SD = cuatro.47, variety 0–24). Around three conditions was indeed useful to determine which organizations would be chose just like the stimulus communities however investigation: (a) the group must be stated from the no less than five members, (b) we sought for to have organizations from various other public jobs and you may classes (age.grams., organizations outlined by relatives and you can elite group jobs and you may intimate orientations), and you can (c) i desired to make certain we had parallel men and women subgroups (elizabeth.g., men political figures and you will female political figures, solitary mothers, and you may unmarried dads) in order to assists evaluations of people consuming an identical societal role and you can class. All of our choices that a teams is going to be stated from the four people is informed by the earlier in the day published works (elizabeth.g., Lee and you may Fiske, 2006; Durante mais aussi al., 2013) but has also been practical in the sense one a stricter expectations would reduce number of communities included and you will a far more easy you might include so many teams to be rated.

Based on such standards, 19 male subgroups (team guys, dads out of small children, police- and you will firemen, bachelors, rich people, functions men, smooth boys, men students, outdoorsy people, unmarried dads, helpful men, single boys, men frontrunners, old boys, gay men, male academics, stylish males, male people in politics, and you can rockers) and you may 22 subgroups of females (single moms and dads, females political leaders, industry people, moms and dads out of children, nurses, feminists, female pupils, outdoorsy females, coaches (the female style of the definition of from inside the Norwegian was applied), lesbians, old ladies, writers, unmarried people, immigrant females, manly females, ladies, female performers, do it people, girls teachers, trend female, housewives, and you will female frontrunners) were chose.

Going for teams in part centered on the salience in the pilot shot is not versus threats. While the Fiske ainsi que al. (2002) revealed, one another teams eliciting aversion plus in-groups could be less inclined to are available. We recognize that our very own a number of organizations is limited in several ways: Such, record cannot include an entire a number of intimate orientations (elizabeth.g., bisexual women or men is excluded, heterosexuality wasn’t mentioned regarding airplane pilot and you may presumably pulled getting granted), and you can “immigrants” were utilized in the place of indicating certain ethnicities otherwise countries regarding origin. We are really not indicating our list is actually representative of subgroups that women and you will boys get end up in. Although not, the newest organizations chose is salient throughout the Norwegian context, and lots of of your included gender subgroups was known inside early in the day browse various other federal contexts (Athenstaedt mais aussi al., 2008).