Lamb, Yards. E., & Gilbride, K. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can in conflict matchmaking (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). When the I’m not beautiful, have you been gorgeous or otherwise not?: Physical-attractiveness reviews and you can relationships needs as the a function of your individual elegance. Mental Science, 19, 669677. [ Links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other close relationships. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. Into the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Character while the conclusion issues (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Backlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating relationship fate which have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ angle: Who and what’s requested issues. Individual Matchmaking, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship high quality during the newlyweds: A few built means. Record from Personality and you may Personal Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, Good. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. R. (2006). Thought similarity and dating achievement one of relationship lovers: An idiographic approach. [ Links ]

Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Matchmaking. Arizona, DC: Statement to your Pew Websites & Western Existence Enterprise. Recovered , regarding [ Backlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Determining the precision of predictions regarding relationship dating: How and just why carry out lovers’ forecasts differ from those made by observers? Identity and Public Mindset Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing facts regarding initiation off heterosexual matchmaking. Paper showed from the First Internationally Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Backlinks ]

Diary out-of Public and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880

Montoya, R. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually genuine resemblance important for attraction? A beneficial meta-study off genuine and you will perceived similarity. Diary out-of Personal and personal Relationship, 25, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]

Electronic relationships and you will virtual relevant: Conceptualizing computers mediated close matchmaking

Morry, Meters. Meters. (2005). Relationship satisfaction because an excellent predictor from resemblance feedback; An examination of one’s interest-resemblance theory. Journal away from Societal and personal Matchmaking, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, Yards. M. (2007). The attraction-resemblance hypothesis among mix-intercourse friends: Relationship pleasure, thought similarities, and you will self-offering perceptions. Diary from Public and personal Relationship, twenty four, 117-138. [ Website links ]

Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of your own SVR concept regarding dyadic combining. Diary from ily, 44, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]

Orbuch, T amazing hot Coronado women. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll splitting up: A great fourteen-season longitudinal study of black people and white partners. Log regarding Public and private Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]

Orenstein, S. (). Brand new like algorithm Meets thinks it has located a formula having ruling the internet relationships company: A scientific strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Best. Business 2.0 Magazine. Recovered to the away from [ Links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive – Character parallels in the couples. Character and you may Individual Distinctions, forty-five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Mate preferences: Just what functions manage everyone notice within short-identity intimate and you will a lot of time-title close couples? Journal of Therapy and you will Person Sex, 12, 1-21. [ Links ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The brand new part of your own mind regarding initiation and you will span of personal interaction. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]