Mutton, Yards. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict matchmaking (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). In the event that hot Give girl I’m not beautiful, are you hot or otherwise not?: Physical-elegance reviews and you can relationships needs just like the a function of an individual’s own appeal. Emotional Science, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in marriage or any other personal relationship. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of ambition. In J. McV. See (Ed.), Identification while the conclusion problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Website links ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship relationship fate with insiders’ and outsiders’ position: Whom and what exactly is expected issues. Personal Relationships, 13, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital high quality from inside the newly wedded couples: A couple centered means. Journal off Personality and you will Personal Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. R. (2006). Imagined similarity and you may relationships success among matchmaking couples: An enthusiastic idiographic means. [ Links ]

Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Online dating. Arizona, DC: Declaration for the Pew Web sites & Western Lives Enterprise. Retrieved , out-of [ Hyperlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Evaluating the precision out of predictions throughout the relationship matchmaking: Just how and just why perform lovers’ predictions range from those individuals produced by perceiver? Identity and you may Public Mindset Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing affairs from the initiation away from heterosexual dating. Papers showed at the Basic Around the world Conference into Personal Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]

Record regarding Social and private Relationship, 23, 865-880

Montoya, R. Yards., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real resemblance necessary for attraction? Good meta-data out-of genuine and you may understood resemblance. Log of Public and private Matchmaking, 25, 889-922. [ Website links ]

Digital dating and virtual linked: Conceptualizing computer mediated personal matchmaking

Morry, M. M. (2005). Matchmaking pleasure because a predictor of resemblance analysis; A test of your destination-resemblance hypothesis. Log off Social and personal Matchmaking, twenty two, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, Meters. M. (2007). New attraction-similarity hypothesis certainly cross-intercourse household members: Relationships satisfaction, seen similarities, and you will care about-offering attitudes. Record out-of Social and personal Relationships, twenty-four, 117-138. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you may extension of your SVR idea away from dyadic pairing. Diary from ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can separation: A great fourteen-year longitudinal examination of black lovers and you can light lovers. Journal regarding Public and personal Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). The newest like formula Meets believes it’s got discovered an algorithm getting governing the net relationship business: A technological way to find Mr. or Ms. Proper. Team dos.0 Mag. Retrieved for the regarding [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive – Personality parallels during the partners. Personality and Personal Distinctions, forty five, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Spouse choices: Exactly what characteristics perform individuals appeal within their brief-title sexual and you will a lot of time-term romantic people? Diary out-of Psychology and you can Individual Sex, a dozen, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The new part of the notice on the initiation and you can span of personal telecommunications. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]